library(tidyverse)
library(gardenR)
library(lubridate)
library(ggthemes)
library(geofacet)
theme_set(theme_minimal())
# Lisa's garden data
data("garden_harvest")
# Seeds/plants (and other garden supply) costs
data("garden_spending")
# Planting dates and locations
data("garden_planting")
# Tidy Tuesday data
kids <- readr::read_csv('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rfordatascience/tidytuesday/master/data/2020/2020-09-15/kids.csv')
Before starting your assignment, you need to get yourself set up on GitHub and make sure GitHub is connected to R Studio. To do that, you should read the instruction (through the “Cloning a repo” section) and watch the video here. Then, do the following (if you get stuck on a step, don’t worry, I will help! You can always get started on the homework and we can figure out the GitHub piece later):
keep_md: TRUE in the YAML heading. The .md file is a markdown (NOT R Markdown) file that is an interim step to creating the html file. They are displayed fairly nicely in GitHub, so we want to keep it and look at it there. Click the boxes next to these two files, commit changes (remember to include a commit message), and push them (green up arrow).Put your name at the top of the document.
For ALL graphs, you should include appropriate labels.
Feel free to change the default theme, which I currently have set to theme_minimal().
Use good coding practice. Read the short sections on good code with pipes and ggplot2. This is part of your grade!
When you are finished with ALL the exercises, uncomment the options at the top so your document looks nicer. Don’t do it before then, or else you might miss some important warnings and messages.
These exercises will reiterate what you learned in the “Expanding the data wrangling toolkit” tutorial. If you haven’t gone through the tutorial yet, you should do that first.
garden_harvest data to find the total harvest weight in pounds for each vegetable and day of week (HINT: use the wday() function from lubridate). Display the results so that the vegetables are rows but the days of the week are columns.garden_harvest %>%
mutate(total_weight_lbs = weight*0.0022046,
day = wday(date, label = TRUE)) %>%
group_by(vegetable, day) %>%
pivot_wider(id_cols = vegetable:units,
names_from = day,
values_from = total_weight_lbs)
garden_harvest data to find the total harvest in pound for each vegetable variety and then try adding the plot from the garden_planting table. This will not turn out perfectly. What is the problem? How might you fix it?garden_harvest %>%
group_by(variety) %>%
summarize(total_harvest_lbs = weight * 0.0022046) %>%
left_join(garden_planting,
by = "variety")
garden_harvest and garden_spending datasets, along with data from somewhere like this to answer this question. You can answer this in words, referencing various join functions. You don’t need R code but could provide some if it’s helpful.You could left_join the garden_harvest data onto the garden_spending data by variety and then utilize the price and weight to determine cost per gram of vegetable and compare this to outside data from somewhere like wholefoods to determine if your cost per gram is less or more than what is sold a grocery stores.
garden_harvest %>%
filter(vegetable == "tomatoes") %>%
mutate(weight_lbs = (weight * 0.0022046),
variety2 = fct_reorder(variety, date)) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = weight_lbs, y = variety2)) +
geom_col() +
labs(title = "Total harvest in lbs for each variety of tomato",
y = "",
x = "")
garden_harvest data, create two new variables: one that makes the varieties lowercase and another that finds the length of the variety name. Arrange the data by vegetable and length of variety name (smallest to largest), with one row for each vegetable variety. HINT: use str_to_lower(), str_length(), and distinct().garden_harvest %>%
mutate(varieties = str_to_lower(variety),
varieties_length = str_length(variety)) %>%
distinct(varieties, .keep_all = TRUE) %>%
arrange(vegetable, varieties_length)
garden_harvest data, find all distinct vegetable varieties that have “er” or “ar” in their name. HINT: str_detect() with an “or” statement (use the | for “or”) and distinct().garden_harvest %>%
mutate(distinct_vegvar = str_detect(variety, "er|ar")) %>%
distinct(variety, .keep_all = TRUE)
In this activity, you’ll examine some factors that may influence the use of bicycles in a bike-renting program. The data come from Washington, DC and cover the last quarter of 2014.
{300px}
{300px}
Two data tables are available:
Trips contains records of individual rentalsStations gives the locations of the bike rental stationsHere is the code to read in the data. We do this a little differently than usual, which is why it is included here rather than at the top of this file. To avoid repeatedly re-reading the files, start the data import chunk with {r cache = TRUE} rather than the usual {r}.
data_site <-
"https://www.macalester.edu/~dshuman1/data/112/2014-Q4-Trips-History-Data.rds"
Trips <- readRDS(gzcon(url(data_site)))
Stations<-read_csv("http://www.macalester.edu/~dshuman1/data/112/DC-Stations.csv")
NOTE: The Trips data table is a random subset of 10,000 trips from the full quarterly data. Start with this small data table to develop your analysis commands. When you have this working well, you should access the full data set of more than 600,000 events by removing -Small from the name of the data_site.
It’s natural to expect that bikes are rented more at some times of day, some days of the week, some months of the year than others. The variable sdate gives the time (including the date) that the rental started. Make the following plots and interpret them:
sdate. Use geom_density().Trips %>%
ggplot(aes(x = sdate)) +
geom_density() +
labs(title = "Frequency of Rides Started Over Time",
x = "",
y = "")
It appears that bike rides are most frequent in october and start to dip as the months go on, probably due to winter.
mutate() with lubridate’s hour() and minute() functions to extract the hour of the day and minute within the hour from sdate. Hint: A minute is 1/60 of an hour, so create a variable where 3:30 is 3.5 and 3:45 is 3.75.Trips %>%
mutate(hourly = hour(sdate) + (minute(sdate) * (1/60))) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = hourly)) +
geom_density() +
labs(title = "Frequency of rides started throughout the day",
y = "",
x = "hour")
It appears that bike rides are most frequent around 9 AM and 5 PM (~17) probably coinciding with work schedules.
Trips %>%
mutate(day = wday(sdate, label =TRUE)) %>%
ggplot(aes(y = day)) +
geom_bar() +
labs(title = "Amount of bike rides each day of the week",
y = "",
x = "")
It appears that the weekend experiences a lesser amount of bike rides compared to the weekdays.
Trips %>%
mutate(hourly = hour(sdate) + (minute(sdate) * (1/60)),
day = wday(sdate, label = TRUE)) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = hourly)) +
geom_density() +
facet_wrap(vars(day)) +
labs(title = "Frequency of rides started throughout the day",
y = "",
x = "hour")
The pattern seems to hold to what I was predicting above, the frequency of bike rides corresponds to worktime so we see peaks and valleys on weekdays and only one peak on the weekends.
The variable client describes whether the renter is a regular user (level Registered) or has not joined the bike-rental organization (Causal). The next set of exercises investigate whether these two different categories of users show different rental behavior and how client interacts with the patterns you found in the previous exercises.
fill aesthetic for geom_density() to the client variable. You should also set alpha = .5 for transparency and color=NA to suppress the outline of the density function.Trips %>%
mutate(hourly = hour(sdate) + (minute(sdate) * (1/60)),
day = wday(sdate, label = TRUE)) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = hourly, fill = client)) +
geom_density(alpha = .5, color=NA) +
facet_wrap(vars(day)) +
labs(title = "Frequency of rides started throughout the day seperated by client",
y = "",
x = "hour")
It appears that casual users are more consistently using the bikes during the middle of the day any day of the week whereas registered users follow work hours during weekdays and similar hours as casual’s on weekends.
position = position_stack() to geom_density(). In your opinion, is this better or worse in terms of telling a story? What are the advantages/disadvantages of each?Trips %>%
mutate(hourly = hour(sdate) + (minute(sdate) * (1/60)),
day = wday(sdate, label = TRUE)) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = hourly, fill = client)) +
geom_density(alpha = .5, color=NA, position = position_stack()) +
facet_wrap(vars(day)) +
labs(title = "Frequency of rides started throughout the day",
y = "",
x = "hour")
In my opinion this style of graph is better for viewing total usage each day while also seeing the impact each client base has on that total, whereas the previous graph is better suited for comparing each client base to each other.
position = position_stack()). Add a new variable to the dataset called weekend which will be “weekend” if the day is Saturday or Sunday and “weekday” otherwise (HINT: use the ifelse() function and the wday() function from lubridate). Then, update the graph from the previous problem by faceting on the new weekend variable.Trips %>%
mutate(hourly = hour(sdate) + (minute(sdate) * (1/60)),
day = wday(sdate, label = TRUE),
weekend = ifelse(day %in% c("Sat", "Sun"), "weekend", 'weekday')) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = hourly, fill = client)) +
geom_density(alpha = .5, color=NA) +
facet_wrap(vars(weekend)) +
labs(title = "Frequency of rides started throughout the day",
y = "",
x = "hour")
client and fill with weekday. What information does this graph tell you that the previous didn’t? Is one graph better than the other?Trips %>%
mutate(hourly = hour(sdate) + (minute(sdate) * (1/60)),
day = wday(sdate, label = TRUE),
weekend = ifelse(day %in% c("Sat", "Sun"), "weekend", 'weekday')) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = hourly, fill = weekend)) +
geom_density(alpha = .5, color=NA) +
facet_wrap(vars(client)) +
labs(title = "Frequency of rides started throughout the day",
y = "",
x = "hour")
This graph tells us more about the habits of registered and casual riders as opposed to the graph above which compares based of time of week. Both are useful for different visualizations.
Stations to make a visualization of the total number of departures from each station in the Trips data. Use either color or size to show the variation in number of departures. We will improve this plot next week when we learn about maps!Trips %>%
left_join(Stations,
by = c("sstation" = "name")) %>%
ggplot(aes(x= lat, y = long, fill = sdate)) +
geom_point()
was unsure of how to do #15 and #16
as_date(sdate) converts sdate from date-time format to date format.Trips %>%
mutate(date = as_date(sdate))
Not sure how to continue on
Use a join operation to make a table with only those trips whose departures match those top ten station-date combinations from the previous part.
Build on the code from the previous problem (ie. copy that code below and then %>% into the next step.) and group the trips by client type and day of the week (use the name, not the number). Find the proportion of trips by day within each client type (ie. the proportions for all 7 days within each client type add up to 1). Display your results so day of week is a column and there is a column for each client type. Interpret your results.
DID YOU REMEMBER TO GO BACK AND CHANGE THIS SET OF EXERCISES TO THE LARGER DATASET? IF NOT, DO THAT NOW.
This problem uses the data from the Tidy Tuesday competition this week, kids. If you need to refresh your memory on the data, read about it here.
facet_geo(). The graphic won’t load below since it came from a location on my computer. So, you’ll have to reference the original html on the moodle page to see it.kids %>%
mutate(start_inf =if_else(year == 1997, inf_adj_perchild, NA_real_),
end_inf = if_else(year == 2016, inf_adj_perchild, NA_real_)) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = year, y = inf_adj_perchild)) +
geom_line() +
facet_geo(~ state)
DID YOU REMEMBER TO UNCOMMENT THE OPTIONS AT THE TOP?